|
|
|
|
The following is a chapter from the book Behind the Veil of Moses, by Brian L. Martin.
If You Are Willing To Receive It “For
all the prophets and the law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to
receive it, he is Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him
hear!” Matt 11:13-15 Prior to embarking on a comparison of the two covenants, we
can gain some valuable insight from an example of Jesus Himself pulling the veil
back for the disciples. In Matthew 17 we read an account of Jesus being
transfigured on the Mount. We note two things from that event: 1) the disciples
saw Elijah (and Moses), and 2) they heard the voice of God proclaiming that
Jesus was His beloved Son. We are not told how the disciples recognized these
Old Testament figures, but we must trust the inspired text. Being eyewitnesses
of Jesus’ ministry, and now hearing a voice from heaven, the disciples were
beginning to realize that Jesus was the Messiah. As they considered this fact,
they questioned Jesus about the coming of Elijah. The person that they had just
seen during the transfiguration was not ministering publicly as Jesus was, yet
Elijah was supposed to come before the Messiah and “prepare a way before
Him.” Thus the disciples’ question: And His disciples asked Him,
saying, “Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?” Matt What was Christ’s reply? Elijah had come! Jesus answered and said to
them, “Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. But I say
to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him
whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their
hands.” Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the
Baptist. Matt 17:11-13 Clearly the disciples had understood the prophecies well
enough to know that Elijah was to come first, yet they had missed the
fulfillment of those prophecies before their very eyes. Because they were still
looking upon the veil, they did not understand that the Elijah of the Old
Covenant was a “type” that saw its fulfillment in John the Baptist. They
properly understood the timing of the fulfillment (Elijah before Messiah), but
not the nature of the fulfillment (not literally Elijah, but one in the spirit
of Elijah). Let’s look at the specific prophecies: The
voice of one crying in the wilderness: “Prepare
the way of the LORD; Make
straight in the desert A
highway for our God. Every
valley shall be exalted And
every mountain and hill brought low; The
crooked places shall be made straight And the
rough places smooth; The
glory of the LORD shall be revealed, And all
flesh shall see it together; For the mouth of the LORD
has spoken.” Isa 40:3-5 “Behold,
I send My messenger, And he
will prepare the way before Me. And the
Lord, whom you seek, Will
suddenly come to His temple, Even the
Messenger of the covenant, In whom
you delight. Behold, He is coming,” Says
the LORD of hosts . . . “Behold,
I will send you Elijah the prophet Before
the coming of the great and dreadful day of the LORD. And he will turn The
hearts of the fathers to the children, And the
hearts of the children to their fathers, Lest I come and strike the
earth with a curse.” Mal 3:1, 4:5-6 And now, let’s look at the Scriptures concerning John the
Baptist: In those days John the
Baptist came preaching in the wilderness of As they departed, Jesus
began to say to the multitudes concerning John: “What did you go out into the
wilderness to see? A reed shaken by the wind? But what did you go out to see? A
man clothed in soft garments? Indeed, those who wear soft clothing are in
kings’ houses. But what did you go out to see? A prophet? Yes, I say to you,
and more than a prophet. For this is he of whom it is written: ‘Behold, I send
My messenger before Your face, Who will prepare Your way before You.’” Matt
11:7-10 “For all the prophets and
the law prophesied until John. And if you are willing to receive it, he is
Elijah who is to come. He who has ears to hear, let him hear!” Matt 11:13-15 As it is written in the
Prophets: “Behold, I send My messenger before Your face, Who will prepare Your
way before You. The voice of one crying in the wilderness: ‘Prepare the way of
the LORD; Make His paths straight.’” John came baptizing in the wilderness
and preaching a baptism of repentance for the remission of sins. Mark 1:2-4 But the angel said to him,
“Do not be afraid, Zacharias, for your prayer is heard; and your wife
Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you shall call his name John. And you will
have joy and gladness, and many will rejoice at his birth. For he will be great
in the sight of the Lord, and shall drink neither wine nor strong drink. He will
also be filled with the Holy Spirit, even from his mother’s womb. And he will
turn many of the children of And you,
child, will be called the prophet of the Highest; For you will go before the
face of the Lord to prepare His ways . . . . Luke 1:76 “This
is he of whom it is written: ‘Behold, I send My messenger before Your face, Who will prepare Your way
before You.’” Luke 7:27 Now this is the testimony of
John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Clearly Jesus Himself taught that John the Baptist was the
“Elijah” who was prophesied to come and prepare a way for the Lord. Yet the
way that He states it seems to imply that He understood that the fulfillment was
not entirely obvious to those around Him. Even John acknowledged that he was not
Elijah, yet he knew that he was “the voice of one crying in the wilderness.”
Notice again Jesus’ words in Matthew 11 (emphasis added): 14 And if
you are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who is to come. 15 He who has ears to
hear, let him hear! IF you are willing to receive it! This almost suggests that Christ
thought some of them might have a hard time swallowing the fact that a prophecy
that they had waited centuries to see fulfilled, had just been fulfilled before
their eyes. It appears that Christ knew, as the disciples’ question implies,
that they were taking the prophecy much too literally, looking for the literal
Old Testament Elijah. Is it too far-fetched to conclude that many have made the
same mistake regarding other prophecies? The Jews misinterpreted the “second
coming” of Elijah and the first coming of the Messiah because of the veil of
Moses. Unfortunately, the church is looking at many of the prophecies regarding
the Second Coming of Christ through the same veil. We will pursue that thought later. First, let’s take a
closer look at the prophecy of Elijah and the fulfillment by John the Baptist.
The following chart lists the details of the ministry of “Elijah”, and
whether or not they were “literally” fulfilled:
Over half of the details concerning the coming of Elijah
were not fulfilled in a literal sense! Keep in mind that not being literally
fulfilled (in a physical, material sense) is not synonymous with not being
fulfilled at all. Philip Mauro states it as follows: .
. . in Scripture the contrast is not between the spiritual and the literal,
but between the spiritual and natural; for a passage of Scripture
may refer, when taken “literally,” either to “that which is natural”
or to “that which is spiritual.” In other words, the literal
interpretation may call for a thing which exists in the realm of nature, or for
the counterpart of that thing which exists in the realm of spiritual realities .
. . .(p. 14, The Hope of Israel: What Is lt?, Philip Mauro—emphasis in
original) The New Testament specifically teaches that John the Baptist
was the fulfillment of the Old Testament prophecies in Isaiah and Malachi about
the coming messenger, Elijah. Because he was not literally Elijah, we must look
for some other type of fulfillment. Call it what you will—spiritual, typical,
or symbolical—there is a fulfillment to be found. John the Baptist was
not Elijah resurrected (or returned to earth), but he was a prophet in the
spirit of Elijah, proclaiming the way of the Lord. For those who were willing to receive it, Jesus was
illustrating a paradigm shift in the nature of fulfilled prophecy. Fulfillments
were seen in the spiritual realm, not necessarily in the physical. This
necessitates viewing through the “eyes of the heart” instead of using our
natural vision, because “the natural man does not receive the things of the
Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; nor can he know them, because
they are spiritually discerned”(1 Cor The literal valleys and mountains, and the crooked and rough
places of Jesus answered and said to
them, “Indeed, Elijah is coming first and will restore all things. But I say
to you that Elijah has come already, and they did not know him but did to him
whatever they wished. Likewise the Son of Man is also about to suffer at their
hands.” Then the disciples understood that He spoke to them of John the
Baptist. Matt 17:11-13 Elijah had already come, and they did not know him.
Likewise, they did not know Christ at His first coming. Unless we make every
effort to allow the New Testament to remove the veil from the Old Testament
prophecies concerning the nature of Christ’s kingdom and the New Covenant, we
are in danger of misinterpreting details concerning the Second Coming. The
interpretation of the Second Coming held by most Christians today sounds
strangely like the “veiled” interpretation the Jews had of His first coming.
But we’re getting ahead of ourselves! If we can see obvious symbolic, or spiritual, fulfillment to
prophecy, confirmed by Jesus Himself, in one place in the Bible, perhaps it is
to be found in other places as well. In fact, should we not expect it? No one
would argue that the spirit (the intent, the objective, the substance) of the
prophecy concerning Elijah was fulfilled. To do so would be calling Christ
either mistaken, or a liar. This begs the question, if Christ had not mentioned
that John the Baptist was “the Elijah to come,” would the Christian
community still be looking for him, as the Jews are today? Strangely enough,
many actually are to a certain degree, by assigning one of the two witnesses in
Revelation as being Elijah. 2 Corinthians 3:6 states that the letter of the law kills,
but the Spirit gives life. The Pharisees were living examples of this—they
took the law, the spirit of which was to lead them to Christ, and made a dead
religion out of it. Are we in danger of doing the same thing with prophecy? Are
we so intent on literalizing every last detail, and then looking for the
fulfillment in our morning paper, that we are in danger of missing the spirit of
the prophecy altogether, just as the disciples were about to do with John the
Baptist? “How can we
know anything, then”, you might ask, “if everything is spiritual?” Before
you throw your hands up in despair, let’s consider a few points. First, the
premise is not that everything is spiritual, rather that not everything
is literal, or more precisely, natural/physical. Secondly, consider
Christ’s response to the disciple’s question about Elijah. He did not rebuke
them for being ignorant, or say “ye of little faith.” He affirmed their
basic understanding of the prophecy, “ . . . Indeed, Elijah is coming first
and will restore all things . . . .” He then went on to clarify their
understanding. Is there not a lesson to be learned here? When unsure about the
interpretation and fulfillment of prophecy, whom should be our primary resource?
Should it not be Jesus, as opposed to the latest prophecy pundit? And how else
do we seek out Christ’s knowledge than by studying the Bible? We should
especially use the inspired interpretations of the New Testament to explain the
Old Testament. To be sure, there are many honest and educated Bible scholars,
commentators, etc., that can offer valuable insight. But we must remember that
each is writing from his/her particular bias, even if unintentionally. The question that we must ask ourselves is, when the
inspired commentary of the New Testament does not fit with the popular and even
time-tested interpretations we hold dear, are we willing to receive it? |
|
|